Acoustic monitoring techniques for bird species identification

Acoustic monitoring techniques for bird species identification have evolved significantly with advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Here are some key methods and tools used for this purpose:

## 1. **Deep Learning Techniques**
- **BirdNET**: This is a deep neural network capable of identifying 984 North American and European bird species by sound[3].
- **LSTM with Coordinate Attention**: A novel method using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks combined with coordinate attention to identify a large number of bird species based on their calls, achieving a mean average precision (mAP) of 77.43%[1].

## 2. **Bioacoustic Monitoring**
- Bioacoustic techniques involve recording and analyzing bird vocalizations to monitor populations. This method has been enhanced by new technologies that allow for more precise detection and classification of species[5].
- Automated click here or passive acoustic monitoring equipment can capture long-term data from fixed locations, providing valuable ecological insights when analyzed using machine learning techniques[7].

## 3. **Band-Limited Phase-Only Correlation (BLPOC) Function**
- This technique is used for acoustic individual identification in birds, offering a click here precise way to distinguish between individuals based on their unique vocal characteristics[2].

## 4. **Animal Sound Identifier (ASI) Software**
- Developed as part of the MATLAB software suite, ASI performs probabilistic classification of species occurrences from field recordings without needing pre-defined reference libraries[3].

These methods collectively enhance the efficiency and accuracy of bird species identification through acoustic means.

### Correct Names:
Some specific tools mentioned include:
- **BirdNET**: A deep neural network.
- **Animal Sound Identifier (ASI)**: A MATLAB software.

Some relevant studies focus on various bird species like *Cercomacra tyrannina*, *Hylorchilus sumichrasti*, *Pitangus sulphuratus*, *Psarocolius montezuma*, and *Amazona viridigenalis* in terms of individual identification using BLPOC functions[2].

Citations:
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36139299/
[2] https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/7/2382
[3] https://3rswildlife.info/detection-birds/
[4] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261229851_Acoustic_monitoring_techniques_for_avian_detection_and_classification
[5] https://www.birdsnz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Steer_2010.pdf
[6] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275969986_Visual_and_acoustic_identification_of_bird_species
[7] https://birdsurveyguidelines.org/acoustic-survey-methods/
[8] https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjz-2023-0044

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *